It might not be your 'last thing' alternative if we could somehow change the 'not suitable for me yet' bit. Quote: 4) I will install additional memory on my hosts or even move them to 64-bit (this is not suitable for me yet, that's why this will be the last thing I will do). So I'm ready to return to this project in 4 cases:ġ) FGRP4 will reduce memory requirements for about 50% at least Ģ) There will be no more CPU work for GW and consequent searches ģ) GW searches will use the same amount of memory as FGRP does but will be less productive Ĥ) I will install additional memory on my hosts or even move them to 64-bit (this is not suitable for me yet, that's why this will be the last thing I will do).Īre there any plans on making this project a little bit more suitable for oldsckoolers like me? I understand that memory requirements can't be lowered for CUDA and OpenCL tasks due to the way programs communicate with GPU effectively. That is why I have to deprecate the use of FGRP4 tasks for now on my hosts. Thanks developers you have GW applications that use 10 times less memory and are very comfortable to me. This is great! But it uses way too much memory and is unsuitable for almost all 32-bit machines I crunch on. It looks like FGRP4 project has got additional work from Fermi and now it have more time to live.

Teamviewer alternative opencl